|
|
In response to requests following our posting of an analysis of 2006-2007 FASIP results, we have now posted here similar analyses for the two preceding years, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. These show consistency with some key results that emerge in the data for 2006-2007:
(1) substantial exclusion of eligible non-tenure-track faculty;
(2) higher percentage increases for female faculty, but on a lower salary base that does not improve sufficiently over the years to close this salary gap;
(3) variations by decanal unit and department, not always consistent from year to year.
We hope that careful appraisal of results for your unit or department over a three year period will assist chairs and peer evaluation committee members in making effective, fair recommendations in the upcoming cycle of enhanced salary adjustments.
Links to pdf files for analyses for previous years:
2004-2005
FASIP by Number of Steps
FASIP by Gender, National Origin, and Rank
Non-Participants in FASIP by Gender, National Origin, and Rank
FASIP by Campus, Unit, and Department
2005-2006
FASIP by Number of Steps
FASIP by Gender, National Origin, and Rank
Non-Participants in FASIP by Gender, National Origin, and Rank
FASIP by Campus, Unit, and Department
|
|
|
